El jefe de Estado venezolano, Nicolás Maduro, durante un acto como parte de su Gobierno de calle en el estado Miranda (centro), destacó que Venezuela es “un pueblo de corazón abierto, y por eso rechaza los ataques de Israel contra Palestina y Siria”.
The Chief of the Venezuelan State (president), Nicolas Maduro, during a Government event from street in Miranda State (center), declared that Venezuela is “an open-hearted people, and therefore rejects Israel’s attacks against Palestine and Syria.”.
I do not know what Palestine had to do with yesterday’s Israeli attacks on Syria, but the President just threw that in there for good measure.
This is coming from Venezuela, by a President who was hand picked by Hugo Chavez to succeed him. Chavez had set up a government policy which was very hostile to Israel.
Apparently, Mr. Maduro, is following in Chavez’s anti-Israel footsteps.
You would have to expect this from a Venezuela under a Chavista president.
Ecuador – under a government similar to Venezuela’s – also criticized Israel.
Published Wednesday 21/12/2011 (updated) 26/12/2011 16:55
MONTEVIDEO, Uruguay (Ma’an) — The Palestinian Authority signed a free trade agreement on Tuesday with South American trading bloc Mercosur.
Okay, this is old news I dug up, but it shows an attitude that South America has with the Palestinians. It is an official pro-Palestinian attitude that you would not see in the United States.
Mercosur is a South American trading bloc with includes Argentina, Brazil Paraguay, Uruguay, and Venuezuela.
When Chavez died last month, much of the world mourned his loss. Though many in the West were glad to see him out of power, it is hard for us in the West to fully appreciate that not only to the Latin world, but also to the Arab World, Chavez was a lion.
To the Arabs, Chavez was a lion.
His pro-Palestinian stance especially endeared him in the contested areas.
Yes, he helped the poor with subsidized education, and assistance. However, like typical leftists, he did it in such a war that it wrecked much of Venezuela’s economy.
In 2002, Chavez withstood a US supported coup against him, which endeared him to the left all over the world.
If he had been previously anti-Israel, and anti-America, after the coup he barreled on, full steam ahead.
He brought in Iranian influence and trade to Latin America; and set up a de-facto alliance between Iran and Venezuela.
Due to Chavez, Venezuela now runs a very anti-Israel transnational television network – TeleSUR – which broadcasts throughout all of Latin America. Even though transnational, Venezuela owns the largest share; and ultimately, a large share of the editorial control. TeleSUR also has a running arrangement with Al Jazeera. One does not have to speak much Spanish to know what effect this is having in Latin America.
Famous 2010 speach where Chavez condemned Israel.
Why was Chavez so anti-Israel?
Was it because Venezuela was 6% Arabic?
I doubt it. The Arabs in Venezuela tend to be elite; and would probably have been his opponents among the better off classes. Besides they are almost all Christian, not Islamic; many from Maronite Catholic ancestry.
Rather, it was probably because of Chavez’s leftist tendencies. Tendencies which had been shaped by a notoriously slippery, politician named Norberto Ceresole, who was a Holocaust denier and anti-semite.
During Chavez’s watch, anti-Semitism increased in Venezuela, and the Jewish community dwindled.
Chavez was merely following a trail that had been blazed a generation earlier by Che Guevera – the premier leftist of his time; and a hero of Chavez.
How could Chavez not follow suit?
In 1959 Che Guevera visited the Palestinian refugee camps in the then Egyptian-controlled Gaza Strip. This is a time when most of the world, outside of Araby, favored the Israelis. It says much about Che Guevera, and about Chavez who would idolize him.
Che Guevera meets Nasser
So when Chavez expelled the Israeli ambassador in 2006, during the Lebanon War – a war started by Hezbollah, not Israel – he was just doing what leftists do naturally.
In Chavez’s case, he mixed his toxic political brew into a still heavily Catholic culture, where there was a reside – albeit declining before his rise to power – of anti-Semitism.
“The world has enough for everybody, but some minorities, the descendants of the same people that crucified Christ, and of those that expelled Bolívar from here and in their own way crucified him… have taken control of the riches of the world.”
-Hugo Chavez
In Chavez’s case, his rhetorical went beyond mere anti-Zionism and became borderline vicious. It gave anti-semitism a new breath of life and respectability in Latin America.
Right now, Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Nicaragua are run by neo-leftists, all of who worked with, and followed in the footsteps of Hugo Chavez. He has done considerable damage to the world body politic. Worse yet, he has left a large propaganda network to carry on after him. His alliance with Ahmedinejad has given Iran a door into the continent.
Chavez was not the totalitarian in the brutal way that Fidel Castro was; but neither was he a real democrat. He was more of bombastic demagogue. The closest historical analog of Chavez was Juan Perón; but even Juan Perón was never personally anti-semitic – in fact, Perón had a Jewish advisor, José Ber Gelbard.
Chavez’s real power was the power to persuade the masses. Unfortunately, he persuaded them to ignoble hatreds.
Chavez had imbibed the genuinely anti-semitic beliefs of Norberto Ceresole, and it affected his administration. He had aligned himself with the genocidally crazy, President Ahmedinejad of Iran. Through Chavez, anti-Israel bile broadcast out into Latin America, and changed the opinions of much of the Hispanic world.
No wonder the Arab world idolized Chavez!
Chavez did hep the poor, who did need helping; but he under his administration, crime rates soared. He bungled the economy with his regulatory controls. His price controls and subsidies just encouraged smuggling.
As is often the case, bombasts like Chavez fix one problem, but create many more.
It is to be hoped that with his passing, Latin American media will get a little bit less ugly; and find some more reasonable reformers.
April 14, 2020 – Edited: Had to find a new video link for a dead video. September 2, 2020 – Made mobile friendly.
