Israel Tried to Move 60,000 Gazans to Paraguay

Israel Tried to Move 60,000 Gazans to Paraguay

Source: The Jerusalem Post
August 12, 2020

The government of Israel secretly planned to encourage Palestinians to move from Gaza to Paraguay, which agreed to accept up to 60,000 of them, according to the minutes from a 1969 cabinet meeting uncovered by KAN journalist Eran Cicurel this week.

The protocol from 1969 states that Israel would bear the travel costs of the Palestinians moving to Paraguay and give each person $100, plus $33 per person would go to the government of Paraguay. At the time of signing the agreement with Paraguay, Israel would pay $350,000 to cover the costs for 10,000 émigrés. The full amount Israel was meant to pay was $33 million.

$33,000,000 (overall)
———————————————–       ==       $550 per Palestinian (overall)
60,000 Gazans (as planned)

Of course, the Palestinians would not get all of that money. Most of it would have gone to travel costs, administration, and payments to the central Paraguayan government.

$100 would be given to each Palestinian personally to relocate?! That was an absurdly low figure.

Why would Paraguay have even considered taking in 60,000 Muslims in?

Because Paraguay was run by a right-wing dictator, Presidente Stroessner, and Israel promised that the Muslims would not be leftist.

Only 30 Palestinians moved to Paraguay.

Had the plan worked, it would have cleared Gaza out of 10% of its population, while making Paraguay roughly 2.5% Muslim at that time. Can you imagine how that demographic percentage would have blossomed over the intervening five decades?

Israel did not, nor does not, seem to mind exporting its Muslim problem. What is amazing is how it did not care about the problems it would have created for Paraguay which would have accepted them.

The creation of a 2.5% Muslim demographic would not have been a minor issue to a poor country like Paraguay. It would have produced a disaster in a few decades.

I have recommended paying Arabs from the contested area to move to South America, but always at immigration rates which would produce less than a 1% Muslim demographic in any country — and even then, only to countries like Brazil, Argentina, or Chile which have the ability to absorb Arabs … not to small countries like Paraguay which could not handle them.

As it is, Paraguay, Brazil, and Argentina meet at what is called the Triple Frontier area of South America. It is notorious for smuggling and Hezbollah penetration. Can you imagine how much worse it would have been if 60,000 more Gazans had immigrated to Paraguay in 1969?

Source: Hezbollah Operations in the Tri-Border Area of South America
Spring 2011

The Tri-Border Area, bounded by Puerto Iguazu, Argentina; Ciudad del Este, Paraguay; and Foz do Iguacu, Brazil, developed into a breeding ground for a wide array of illegal interests. As a result, the research community considers it to be lush ground for terrorist organizations to operate unrestricted, including Hezbollah.

And I have always recommended giving the immigrants enough money to set themselves up, and not become a social problem. Today that amount would be roughly $100,000 per Arab, not chump change.

In 1969, that would have been equivalent to $14,000 per Arab, not the $100 given to each Arab personally.

Israel wanted to effect this movement far too cheaply, even by 1969 standards.


December 8, 2023 — Added a discovered old tweet, for interest.

What We Do Not See In The United States


Posted on YouTube: October 14, 2019
(obviously concerning Christmas)
The Closing Line says: THIS CHRISTMAS WE DO NOT FORGET THE CHILDREN OF BETHLEHEM

Note: the opening seconds of the video look like they were taken from the destruction in Syria, not Bethlehem. If so, the pro-Palestinian video is grossly dishonest.

The two videos on this post come from the Federación Palestina de Chile, which is extraordinarily anti-Israel. Take that into account.


I am not saying our American media lies about the Mideast. From what I have noticed, it could be argued that much of the rest of the world gets a slanted view – slanted to the opposite side of what we see in the USA.

HOWEVER, most Americans do not know what the rest of the world sees, particularly in Latin America. I offer these videos on this website as an example.

In Chile and Honduras – where Palestinians are the most influential Arabic communities – the hostility to Israel is palpable, with political clout. In those countries where the Maronite (Lebanese) Christians are the most influential Arab community, the sentiment is muted.

What is amazing is that almost all of these Palestinian-Latin-Americans hold an idealized, fantasy version of how wonderful Palestine was to their ancestors when the Arabs ruled. Were that so, their ancestors would not have fled to Latin America – and fled they did.

The Muslims treated Christians like dhimmis, and often went on genocidal campaigns against Christians.

But this is what fuels much of the public opinion in Latin America, an idealized, fantasy memory of Palestine.

For example, this video supports BDS against Israel. It opens with the line: SUPPORT FOR BDS IS GROWING IN THE WORLD.


Posted on YouTube: January 2, 2018

I am not asking you to agree with these anti-Israel views. I do not.

But you should be aware of them. It is a whole other world out there in Latin America.

An Interesting Passport from Chile

This is an embedded tweet from Twitter which shows an old passport of a Palestinian-Chilean. It lists that the bearer was born in Beit Jala in 1890, in the province of Jerusalem, and arrived in Chile in 1906 – when he was 16. He probably came over with his parents and siblings.

Arabs started immigrating to Chile around 1890, and this is proof of that early migration.

What is interesting is that the passport lists the place where he was born as Palestine, and lists Palestinian as a nationality.

The twitter account claims that the passport was the possession of his grandfather Clarito. I have to suspect that the passport is of his great-grandfather if it goes that far back.

The Tweet says (CI. From my grandfather, Clarito leaves where he was born in 1890, and they say that PALESTINE did not exist.)[ translated by a Google app].

The tweeter uses the passport to defend that Palestine was an identity, even at that early date.

I support Israel’s right to exist, but I do not deny that Palestinians have an identity, though some Zionists deny this. I know what the tweeter means. And, as noted, I have no problem using the term Palestinian.

However, the Palestinians who went to Chile were often Christian. They would have had no problem calling themselves Palestinians. Muslims operate under a different worldview, and see a problem with nation-states. They prefer the idea of an Ummah (Muslim homeland).

Nor is the date – that the passport was issued – noted. The passport may have been issued much, much later in the bearer’s lifetime.

There Is Nothing Like This In America

There Is Nothing Like This In America


Posted on YouTube: July 9, 2020

No politician in the United States could get away with the anti-Israel rhetoric which is common in Chile. This video from the World Jewish Congress shows you how strongly anti-Israel the politics are in Chile.

This is what happens when one of Chile’s wealthiest elite groups is Palestinian Chilean. In Chile, the Jews are outnumbers 30 to 1 by Palestinian Christians.

Page 12 of 28
1 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 28